Ignoring the Internet: How the Other Half Lives

The Pew Internet & American Life Project has released a report titled, A Typology of Information and Communication Technology Users (pdf). The report is being covered by iMedia, with the article title, Nearly Half of Americans Ignore Internet.

The study by Pew was undertaken with the explicit mission to make known the segments of the population that make robust use of information technology amid the advent of Web 2.0. The survey was conducted over the telephone between February 15th, 2006 and April 6th, 2006, among a sampling of 4,001 adults, aged 18 and older.

Pew culled the results together and created 10 groups that each have their own particular characteristics, attitudes and usage patterns. Broadly these 10 groups fit into three higher groups: the Elite users, the Middle-of-the-road users, and the Few Technology Assets users.

  • 31% of American adults can be considered Elite Tech users
  • 20% of American adults can be considered Middle-of-the-road users
  • 49% have little use for modern gadgets and usually stick to plain ole telephones and television.

Of the 31% that were considered Elite Tech users, the reader’s of this blog might fall into the sub-category Omnivores; of which 8% of American adults constitute. These are the people most active in the information economy and are watching video on an iPod, txt’ing to their friends, logging into Web 2.0 websites and most Omnivores are in their 20’s with high-speed Internet connections at home or work.

Of the 49% that were considered disconnected from the Internet, iMedia stipulates on why this situation might have arisen:

Information overload, cost and a general perception that pastimes such as blogging and spending time on YouTube aren’t for them, are some of the key obstacles from bringing nearly half of U.S. adults into the digital age, according to Horrigan.

The potential for digital information technology that benefits and serves this very large disconnected group is extremely vast and promising. Ok, now stop reading this and start something for this other half.

Sphere: Related Content

The Most Successful Viral Tactics

We had a brief discussion Monday night at the Portland Social Media workgroup about viral marketing.  I just came across a survey published in eMarketer Daily, conducted by MarketingSherpa - 2,914 responses were collected.

Read the rest of this entry »

Sphere: Related Content

Art Face Off

I came across Art Face Off via an email from Portland Adverting Federation’s VOX email newsletter this afternoon.

Who?
Art Face Off is online community with the stated mission: Forging a new art world through democracy and community.

Read the rest of this entry »

Sphere: Related Content

Exhibit A, Stumble Power

I have a fine example, via Om Malik, of the power of StumbleUpon - I wrote an introduction for those unaware of StumbleUpon the other day here on Portland Social Media; you can read the article at StumbleUpon v. Google v. Digg. Fight!. Om links to Vinod, who uses Google Analytics to make his point (sign-up for a Analytics account here), who explains he saw his RSS subscription base increased from 17 to 476 in one day.

He wrote one post that got stumbled, and now that post brings in a lot of traffic each day - StumbleUpon rivaling Digg? Yep. So if you create podcasts or videopodcasts or just interesting content, make sure it’s easy for your visitors to Stumble your post, just like in the way you’ve made your post easy to Digg or del.icio.us.

Sphere: Related Content

StumbleUpon v. Google v. Digg. Fight!

I made Jason and Josh listen to my praise heaped upon StumbleUpon and Josh asked how it’s different from Digg and Google.  Interested?  Then check out StumbleUpon Defined vs. Digg, Google, MySpace and More.

Do you Stumble?  Leave comment if so, or if you use something similar but you feel better!

Sphere: Related Content